Scenario Modeling of Cross-Border Interactions in Central Asia: A Methodological Approach
Keywords:
Cross-border cooperation, Central Asia, scenario modeling, SWOT analysis, binary probability model, regional security, Fergana Valley, political forecasting.Abstract
This article presents a hybrid methodological framework for scenario modeling of cross-border interactions in Central Asia, with a focus on the Fergana Valley. The region’s geopolitical complexity—marked by disputed borders, interethnic tensions, and uneven institutional capacities—demands an approach that can account for both structural constraints and behavioral dynamics. Combining SWOT analysis and binary logistic regression, the study identifies key variables that influence the probability of conflict or cooperation among neighboring states. Three scenarios—Escalation, Cooperation, and Inertia—are developed based on empirical data and modeled projections. The results highlight the significance of diplomatic engagement, formal agreements, and third-party mediation in shaping outcomes. This scenario-based approach not only enhances predictive capacities but also provides a strategic tool for early-warning systems and policy planning. The methodology is scalable and applicable to other conflict-prone border regions worldwide.References
1.Collier, P., Elliot, V., Hegre, H., Hoeffler, A., Reynal-Querol, M., & Sambanis, N. (2003). Breaking the Conflict Trap: Civil War and Development Policy. World Bank & Oxford University Press.
2.Helms, M. M., & Nixon, J. (2010). Exploring SWOT analysis – where are we now? Journal of Strategy and Management, 3(3), 215–251.
3.International Crisis Group. (2023). Rethinking Border Disputes in Central Asia. ICG Policy Brief No. 102.
4.Kahane, A. (2012). Transformative Scenario Planning: Working Together to Change the Future. Berrett-Koehler Publishers.
5.Keohane, R. O., & Nye, J. S. (2001). Power and Interdependence (3rd ed.). Longman.
6.King, G., Keohane, R. O., & Verba, S. (1994). Designing Social Inquiry: Scientific Inference in Qualitative Research. Princeton University Press
7.Lillis, J. (2020). The New Diplomacy of Uzbekistan: Regional Reset in Central Asia. Eurasianet. Retrieved from https://eurasianet.org
8.Megoran, N. (2017). Nationalism in Central Asia: A Biography of the Uzbekistan-Kyrgyzstan Boundary. University of Pittsburgh Press.
9.Reeves, M. (2014). Border Work: Spatial Lives of the State in Rural Central Asia. Cornell University Press.
10.Söderbaum, F. (2015). Rethinking Regionalism. Palgrave Macmillan.
11.UNDP. (2020). Human Development Report: Central Asia at a Crossroads. United Nations Development Programme, Regional Bureau for Europe and the CIS.
12.van Notten, P. W. F. (2006). Scenario development: A typology of approaches. Foresight, 8(1), 5–21. https://doi.org/10.1108/14636680610647125
13.Wendt, A. (1999). Social Theory of International Politics. Cambridge University Press.
14.Wong, D., & Villanueva, A. (2022). Cross-border integration, cooperation and governance: A systems approach for evaluating “good” governance in cross-border regions. Journal of Borderlands Studies, 37(1), 23–45. https://doi.org/10.1080/08865655.2020.1858903
6.King, G., Keohane, R. O., & Verba, S. (1994). Designing Social Inquiry: Scientific Inference in Qualitative Research. Princeton University Press.
