Barriers to Entry for Foreign Investors in Uzbekistan's Asset Markets: Examine Legal, Regulatory, and Economic Barriers that Foreign Investors Face and Suggest Potential Improvements
Keywords:
Economic challenges, asset market, securities, laws, international stocks, economic downturn.Abstract
Uzbekistan, a country located in Central Asia, has been actively promoting itself as an attractive investment destination in recent years. The country's strategic location, rich natural resources, and significant economic growth potential make it an appealing target for foreign investors. However, despite these advantages, foreign investors still face significant barriers to entry in Uzbekistan's asset markets. This article aims to identify and critically analyze the key barriers to entry for foreign investors in Uzbekistan's asset markets, highlighting the challenges and implications for potential investors.
References
Rolland S.E. The Return of State Remedies in Investor-State Dispute Settlement: Trends in Developing Countries, 49(2) Loyola University Chicago Law Journal 387 (2017).
Shmatenko L. An Overview of Kazakhstan's Investment Laws and its Investor-State Arbitral Awards, 30(4) international Law Quarterly 26 (2013).
Umirdinov A. The End of Hibernation of Stabilization Clause in Investment Arbitration: Reassessing Its Contribution to Sustainable Development, 43(4) Denver Journal of international Law and Policy 455 (2015).
VanDerMeulen J. & Trebilcock M.J. Canada's Policy Response to Foreign Sovereign Investment: Operationalizing National Security Exceptions, 47(3) Canadian Business Law Review 392 (2009).
Wagner M. Regulatory Space in International Trade Law and International Investment Law, 36(1) University of Pennsylvania Journal of international Law 1 (2014).
Wong D. From Redundancy to Resurgency: Revisiting the Local Remedies Rule in International Investment Arbitration, 35 Singapore Law Review 114 (2017).
Zheng C.R. The Territoriality Requirement in Investment Treaties: A Constraint on Jurisdictional Expansionism, 34 Singapore Law Review 139 (2016).
