Relevance and Application of Compulsory Health Insurance in Republic of Uzbekistan
Keywords:
compulsory and voluntary health insurance, healthcare, international experience.Abstract
The main features of the health sector - its colossal social significance and availability of guaranteed legislative norms of the state for number of basic health services to population of particular country. The enormous social importance of the healthcare sector and active state regulations completed the medical services market, need for professional intermediaries capable of qualitatively defend the rights of patients. Such, as a rule, are insurance organizations. As the world experience demonstrates, medical insurance (both voluntary and compulsory) is able to play a very positive role in improving the quality of medical services, by attracting additional resources to the health sector, protecting interests and rights of wide sections of the population. In Uzbekistan, this insurance industry is still at its initial stage development. There are a number of problems that prevent a wider dissemination of this type of insurance services. Studying the problems and features of the market and appropriate recommendations with innovative ideas for development is the main purpose of this paper.
References
Richard Kirsch, Fighting for Our Health: The Epic Battle To Make Health Care a Right in the United States 31-32 (2012).
Richard E. Anderson, M.D., Response, Case Study Question: How can the Current State of Medical Malpractice Insurance be Improved?, 5 YALE J. HEALTH POL’Y L. & ETHICS 341 (2005)
Bryan A. Liang & LiLan Ren, Medical Liability Insurance and Damage Caps: Getting Beyond Band Aids to Substantive Systems Treatment to Improve Quality and Safety in Healthcare, 30 AM. J.L. & MED. 501 (2004)
Eric W. Collins, Note, Level 3 v. Federal Insurance: Do you Know What is in Your Directors and Officers Liability Insurance Policy?, 73 UMKC L. REV. 199 (2004)
Neil A. Doherty, Brian A. O’Dea & Hal J. Singer, The Secondary Market for Life Insurance Policies: Uncovering Life Insurance’s “Hidden” Value, 6 MARQ. ELDER’S ADVISOR 95 (2004)
Russell Korobkin, The Battle Over Self-Insured Health Plans, or “One Good Loophole Deserves Another,” 5 YALE J. HEALTH POL’Y L. & ETHICS 89 (2005)
Kyle D. Logue, The Current Life Insurance Crisis: How the Law Should Respond, 32 CUMB. L. REV. 1 (2001-2002)
Amy Bucossi, Notes & Comments: Ascertaining Duty of Care in the Life Insurance Industry: A Survey of Insurance Law and a Proposal for State Mandatory Disclosure Legislation, 18 N.Y.L. SCH. J. HUM. RTS. 5 (2001)
Katherine E. Giddings and J. Stephen Zielezienski, Insurance Defense in the Twenty-First Century: The Florida Bar’s Proposed Statement of Insured Client’s Rights—A Unique Approach to the Tripartite Relationship, 28 FLA. ST. U. L. REV. 855 (2001)
Douglas R. Richmond, Rights and Responsibilities of Excess Insurers, 78 DENV. U. L. REV. 29 (2000)
Lisa N. Bleed, Enforcing Subrogation Provisions As “Appropriate Equitable Relief” Under ERISA Section 502(A)(3), 35 U.S.F. L. REV. 727 (2001)
Lisa J. Andeen, Improving Health Care for Uninsured Children in the Wake of the State Children’s Health Insurance Program (SCHIP), 27 J. LEGIS. 299 (2001)
Phyllis C. Borzi, Distinguishing Between Coverage and Treatment Decisions under ERISA Health Plans: What’s Left of ERISA Preemption? 49 BUFF. L. REV. 1219 (2001)
Russell B. Wuehler, Rethinking Insurance’s Public Policy Exclusion: California’s Befuddled Attempt to Apply and Undefined Rule and a Call for Reform, 49 UCLA L. REV. 651 (2001).
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
