Problems of Determining the Status of the Embryo as an Object of Civil Law

Authors

  • Babajanova Dinara Islamovna Doctor of Philosophy in Law (PhD) at Tashkent State University of Law

Keywords:

Embryo, civil law, legal status, ethical considerations, object, determination, in vitro fertilisation.

Abstract

This article provides a comprehensive analysis of the challenges and ethical considerations involved in determining the legal status of the embryo as an object of civil law. The author explores the varying legal approaches taken by different countries, highlighting the complexities and controversies surrounding the issue. The article also delves into the ethical implications of defining the legal status of the embryo, particularly in relation to reproductive rights and the moral status of human life. Overall, the article offers valuable insights into a complex and sensitive topic that requires careful consideration and reflection from both legal and ethical perspectives.

References

Оксфордская иллюстрированная энциклопедия. - М.: Прогресс, 1999. С.388.

Курило Л.Ф. Развитие эмбриона человека и некоторые морально-этические проблемы методов вспомогательной репродукции // Проблемы репродукции.– 1998.– № 3.– С. 39 – 49.

Белобрагина Н. А. Правовой статус эмбриона // Известия ТулГУ. Экономические и юридические науки. 2013. №1-2. С. 34-38. С. 35.

Федосеева Н.Н., Фролова Е.А. Проблема определения правового статуса эмбриона в международном и российском праве // Медицинское право. – 2008. - №1. – СПС «КонсультантПлюс».

Основы социальной концепции Русской православной церкви//http:// www.coe.int/Bioethics

Павленко И. Безмолвный крик//Здоровье. 1992. № 1.

Судо Ж. Аборт//http://www.religion/catholic/aborto2.htm/biohist.htm

Tooley M. Abortion and infanticide//Gorovitz Set al (cols) Moral problem in medicine. Prentice. Hall, Englewood Cliffs. 1976. С. 302.

Bayles M.D. Reproductive ethics//Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, 1984.

Davis v Davis 842 SW 2d.

Davis v Davis No E-14496, 1989 WL 140495 (Tenn Cir Ct Sept 21, 1989).

Davis v Davis No 180, 1990 WL 130807 (Tenn Ct App 13, 1990).

Davis v Davis 842 SW 2d.

Wrongful Death Statute Tenn Code Ann 20-5-106.

Van der Vyver JD and Joubert DJ Persone- en Familiereg 3rd ed (Juta Cape Town 1991).

Downloads

Published

2024-01-12

How to Cite

Babajanova Dinara Islamovna. (2024). Problems of Determining the Status of the Embryo as an Object of Civil Law. International Journal of Scientific Trends, 3(1), 21–26. Retrieved from http://scientifictrends.org/index.php/ijst/article/view/187

Issue

Vol. 3 No. 1 (2024): IJST

Section

Articles

License

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.